Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill - 1206 Words

Big decisions are life changing and everyone makes them. The decision of what to do after high school. Or whether a person should marry their current companion. These decisions are the crossroads of a person’s life. Jim’s decision is a little different. He face a moral dilemma which affects the indigenous people of South America. According to moral relativism, every person has a different moral perspective of different issues. Therefore, if every person has a different belief of morality, there is no right answer to dilemmas only different opinions. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers with two different views on a person’s moral conscious. Kant believes morality is a duty that people should hold above their own happiness.†¦show more content†¦Even though Jim wants to help and would gain happiness by saving the lives of the indigenous people in South America, according to Kant’s principles it would not be morally good. By following duty, a person utilizes reason to disregard their natural instincts of self-preservation and to attain happiness for themselves. Kant’s position of ethics is deontological, or duty based ethics. In the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant asserts the 3 propositions of duty. â€Å"For an action to have genuine moral worth, it must be done from duty,† (Kant 9). Which means that if Jim decides to either shoot a native or start a rebellion, he would not be performing those actions solely for assisting people in need, but also fulfilling his personal desire to help the natives. Therefore his action is not purely good. The second proposition, â€Å"An action that is done from duty doesn’t get its moral value from the purpose that’s to be achieved through it, but from the maxim that it involves,† (Kant 9). The value of Jim’s action isn’t judged based on its consequences, but his maxim, his personal agenda. Considering Jim could use his actions for personal pleasure in fulfilling a heroic fantasy. Not entirely for duty or for the law his actions are not pure. F inally proposition 3, â€Å"To have a duty is to be required to act in a certain way out of respect for law,† (Kant 10). According to proposition 3, the rules of moral law

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Street Car Named Desire Stanleys Brutality Essay Example For Students

Street Car Named Desire: Stanleys Brutality Essay In the Street Car Named Desire, by Tennessee Williams, Stanley Kowalski displays his brutality in many ways. This classical play is about Blanche Duboiss visit to Elysian Fields and her encounters with her sisters brutal and arrogant husband, Stanley Kowalski, and the reveling truth of why Blanche really came. Stanley Kowalski is a very brutal and barbaric person who always has to feel that no one is better than him. His brutish and ferocious actions during the play leave the reader with a bad taste in their mouths. Stanleys brutality is shown in several places during the duration of The Street Car Named Desire . For example, his first array of brutality is evident at the poker night when he gets so angry and throws the radio out the window. Another example of his brutality is displayed when he beats his wife, Stella. Lastly, his arrogance and ferocious actions are most apparent when he rapes Blanche, while his wife is in labor in the hospital. Stanley Kowalskis first exhibition of his brutal actions occurs at poker night. Blanche turns on the radio, but Stanley demands her to turn it off. Blanche refuses and so Stanley gets up himself and turns it off himself. When Stanleys friend, Mitch, drops out of the game to talk to Blanche, Stanley gets upset and he even gets more upset when Blanche flicks on the radio. Due to the music being on, Stanley, in a rage, stalks in the room and grabs the radio and throws it out the window. His friends immediately jump up, and then they drag him to the shower to try to sober him up. This is the first example of Stanleys rage and brutality. Not only does throwing the radio out the window represent an impure demeanor, but so does beating your wife. During his entire rage during poker night he is not sober which leads to another problem. When he threw the radio out the window, he then immediately charged right at his wife, Stella. He was in such rage and he was so drunk that when he reached her he hit her in the face. Luckily, before he can get another blow off his friends grabbed him and pinned him to the floor. This action leads the reader to believe that he is a very brutal person and needs some psychological help to aid him to control his temper. This is another example of why Stanley is so brutal. Lastly, and the most evident action that leads the reader to believe that Stanley is very ferocious and rapacious is when he rapes Blanche Dubois. When Blanche finds out that Stanley has to spend the night at home because Stella did not give birth yet, she becomes wary and is alarmed at the thought that of being alone in the house alone with him is a scary thought. When Blanche tells Stanley that she has put Mitch in his place for being mean to her, Stanley explodes in terror. Then Stanley retreats to the bathroom to put on his silk pajamas. When he comes out of the bathroom, Blanche is threatened by his words and she smashes a bottle on the table to use the sharp edge to fend him off. Stanley approaches her carefully, but Blanche swings at him and Stanley catches her arm and forces her to drop the weapon. She then collapses at his feet and he picks her up and carries her to the bedroom and rapes her. This event shows that Stanley is very brutal and avaricious because it shows that h e was greedy to the fact that he could not just have one woman, and it also showed that he is very arrogant because he feels that now because he conquered Blanche and he has won.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

The Future Of Traditional Retailing Essays - Retailing,

The Future Of Traditional Retailing Retailing can be vaguely described as the business of selling goods or services to the final customer. This particular area of business is extremely important to the economy, totaling an estimated three trillion dollars in sales per year. Retailers are in constant battle among themselves to find new and innovative ways to meet the customers needs and wants in order to secure a share of the market. There are numerous channels through which retailing can be performed. The most prominent form is the brick-and-mortar operation. This category consists of the physical store locations where customers can go to browse through the selection of merchandise. These operations have been a staple in communities for years past and will most likely remain for years to come. However, their stronghold on the retail industry is being seriously threatened by the extraordinary growth of e-commerce. E-commerce is defined as the business of retailing conducted over the Internet. Although the retailing industry is a driving force behind the economy, its magnitude leaves little room for growth. The industry has reached its maturity, sales have not grown in great proportions, and expansion has slowed (Loeb, May 1998). In addition, the level of competition is at a high. Customers have more choices than ever on how to spend their dollar with the abundance of stores and catalogs (Maruca, Jul/Aug 1999). These conditions have lead retailers to search for a different channel by which to reach consumers. A relatively new development has been the introduction of Internet-based retailing. It is estimated that online sales have tripled between 1997 and 1998, reaching roughly nine billion dollars. With the growing number of households joining the Web each day, projections indicate no signs of slowing down anytime soon (Anonymous, Aug 1999). Interactive retailing can prove to be a real threat to existing businesses. A recent article by Bob Woods discussed a report from Jupiter Communications LLC which claims that most of the growth will come at the expense of traditional retailing (Aug 13, 1999, p. 11). The report goes on to state that a large part of Internet sales is not growth, but a shift in dollars from traditional retail channels. In order to regain lost sales, many brick-and-mortar outlets have ventured into the World Wide Web. A new study has discovered that sixty-two percent of all online sales come from retailers who have made that transition (Hogsett, July 26, 1999). The impact of the surge of online shopping can only be presumed at this point. It has been argued that e-commerce will change the face of retailing permanently, making traditional retailing obsolete. On the other hand, it can be said that e-commerce will act a supplement, but not a replacement for brick-and-mortar operations. It is my opinion that traditional retailing will not become extinct due to the expansion of the Internets capabilities. The sense of taste and touch will always create a need for consumers to be able to purchase specialized items in person, rather than through a computer screen. The act of shopping also satisfies a social need. Jay Scansaroli and Vicky Eng stated that shopping is about being in a community, browsing, discussing items with others, stumbling across the unknown (Jan 1997, p. 4A). Instead of competing for customers with traditional retailers, I expect that online shopping will cater to a distinct segment of the market; those who value time, convenience, and comfort. With the increase in two-income families and single parent households, the ability for customers to shop at their leisure is a great advantage. Those who are willing to shell out a few extra bucks for a saved minute or two will benefit most from this trend (Neuborne, July 26, 1999). Just like the introduction of the catalog did not destroy traditional retailing, neither will the Internet. Brick-and-mortar stores will remain intact to provide for those customers who desire interaction with others, and who require face-to-face judgments regarding certain purchases. Although online shopping has the advantage of creating databases to collect information to bring customer service to new levels, it has not been able to utilize its full potential. In the end, it is difficult to predict the exact futures o f retailing. Consumers are individuals, and